Multi-Criteria Risk Calculator
Adjust weights and sea level to explore coastal flood risk
MCE Weights (auto-normalised)
Sea Level Scenario
Map Layers (exposure context)
Economic Impact Estimate
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Flooded area | — |
| Flooded houses | — |
| Flooded roads | — |
| House losses | — |
| Road losses | — |
| Total losses | — |
Mitigation Comparison
Seawall
Managed Retreat
Guided Questions
Look at the risk map. Identify each MCE component for the New Brighton flood scenario. What data layer represents Hazard? Exposure? Vulnerability?
Set weights to Hazard 60%, Exposure 30%, Vulnerability 10%. Then change to equal weights (33/33/33). How does the risk map change? Which weighting is more appropriate for coastal flood planning?
At 2 m sea level rise, what is the estimated total economic loss? Read from the impact panel. Are the $600k/house and $1.5M/km road assumptions reasonable for Christchurch in 2025?
Compare the seawall cost vs relocation cost at your chosen sea level. Which strategy do you recommend and why? Consider both economics and non-monetary factors.
Why is sensitivity analysis essential in MCE? Change one weight by ±20% — does the highest-risk area change location? What does this tell you about result robustness?